I'm Mik. Model, mother, moron. Future meta-magician. Former logic clinician.
My better half and I own Brainfood Bookstore in Longmont, Colorado. It is the only exclusively indie- and local-lit bookstore in the nation. We meet a lot of crazy folks.
Testimonial from a former roommate:
"Living with you was like living with a quiet little opinionated deer person who floated around like a ghost and said smart/nutso things and ate seaweed. "
I love Colorado. I love mountains. I love hiking. I read and write. I raise my children to the best of my ability. I have lupus and have defeated early-stage cancer twice, so I pretty much fully support the use of medical marijuana.
Catching Elephant is a theme by Andy Taylor
They go to 100, but apparently it’s a measure of air pressure and not setting, because if you wiggle around, the number changes without you pressing anything. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that the numbers aren’t a setting and keep trying to ‘set’ it which isn’t working because THAT’S NOT WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE. This is literally just like the time when I was first learning Formal Logic and I thought sentences were math equations and I couldn’t make it work because they’re NOT
My friend Chris is an electrical engineer and he thought of something one day. Pi, because it is an irrational number, it is basically just an infinite string of numbers that is pretty much random. It doesn’t have a repeating pattern, it’s just a bunch of numbers that are pretty much meaningless. However, because he’s an electrical engineer and is thinking about computers when he isn’t sleeping or eating, a thought occurred to him. If you took any set of information and coded it in base-10 (digits 0-9), it would also appear as a random string of numbers.
For anyone not familiar with how computers work: All computers use binary (digits 0 and 1) to code information. This is because of the physical characteristics of data storage. Early computers had lights on or off, cards punched or not punched, and now hard drives, for example, are magnetized in patterns of reversing or not reversing direction. Coding in base-10 means that there are 10 options for any specific bit of information (imagine each lightbulb has 10 different brightnesses instead of simply on or off). This means more information could be stored in less space. Genes are coded in base-4 (ATCG), and English words are coded in base-26 (a through z).
Back to Pi. Because pi has an infinite string of random numbers, at some point, any string of numbers will exist somewhere along the line. Using this idea, any piece of information could be stored in base-10 inside pi. You could code the text of the entire Encyclopaedia Brittanica, the Mona Lisa, the Star Wars trilogy, or even this blog and find it somewhere in pi.
Think about it for a sec. Let it blow your mind a little bit.
Now. Here’s the best part.
I asked myself, “What is pi, again?” Right, the ratio between a circle’s circumference and its diameter. π=c/d
Every circle inherently stores every single piece of information that has ever existed or ever will exist from the big bang to the end of the universe.
Circles are literally everything.
Mind blown.
There are no people in the whole world who are as smart as me but also as bad at chess as me.
Like, it’s this insane phenomenon. It was previously thought to be impossible for someone to have my IQ andyet be so miserably inept at chess. I teach logic, for chrissakes. No one else who is as adept at logic as me is this bad at chess. I’m the Great Mythological Chess Derper.
Today, the day of the final, one of my students asked me, “What’s modus ponens?”
But twenty seconds later she mentioned that she watches a lot of Fox News, so I immediately understood.
A girl in the logic clinic, upon hearing of inductive logic.
Firstly I would recommend you undergo and intense psychological evaluation. You may suffer from delusions or one or more personality disorders.
I kid, I kid. But I honestly can’t imagine learning logic from a book, outside a classroom. The ‘textbook’ I used for introductory (or informal) logic was really a loose-leaf composited by the professors at my university. I also took formal logic. The textbook our class used was The Logic Book by Merrie Bergmann et al. According to one of my colleagues, the textbook as well as the answer key can be purchased for about $6 from ABE books.
I’ll start off assuming you don’t know what logic is. Logic is part of epistemology, which is a branch of philosophy. Epistemology is the study of what we know and how we know it. Logic is the study of valid reasoning. Logic comes in two types: Deductive and inductive logic. Inductive logic is essentially statistics (If something that is a dog has a 95% chance of having a tail, and Fido is a dog, than I can that there is a 95% chance that Fido has a tail).
Deductive logic comes in two types: Sentential logic and predicate logic. These are both systems (math is another type of system) of symbolizing ideas in English syntax (obviously, it could be done with other languages as well). For example, I want to say that apples fall from a tree only if they are ripe. In sentential logic, it would be something like f—>r. In predicate logic, it would look like (x)(Ax—>(Fx—>Rx)), or “For all things X, if it is an apple, then if falls from a tree only if it is ripe.”
As you can imagine, courses in logic are rather confusing and move rather quickly. My university employs several philosophy majors (myself included) to work in a room in the basement of the Philosophy department. It’s called the Logic Lab or Logic Clinic, but the room is more of a cross between an office and a library. We assist logic students. Mostly we deal with either students who haven’t read the textbook and have no idea what’s going on, or we provide emotional support and counseling for the students who have broke down and insist they will never understand logic (despite the fact that often do). Please see my page Why Do People in the Logic Lab Need Logic? for further clarification.
Me: So you want to switch the order of the consequent and the antecedent, and reverse their truth values. Which equivalence would that be?
Student: Contraception?
Me: ....contraposition.
Cool, who are you? :)
My first language was Creole but I stopped having contact with Creoles when I was 5 so I quickly lost my vocabulary. My primary language is English, and I consider French a ‘foreign language’ but because of my extensive exposure to Creole, French really doesn’t seem like a true foreign language. It’s almost native. I’ve been quite interested in that distinction, and loved language since I was a child. At various intervals, I attempted to teach myself German, Japanese, Roma, Russian, and Latin… there’s probably others that I am forgetting. I’ve had the most recent success with Russian, but as a child I would usually accumulate a vocabulary of 500 to 1000 words before simply getting bored and moving on to a new language… losing my abilities in the previous language.
Now, I work in a logic lab. What I truly enjoy about logic is that it is language, symbolized. It removes all connotations (for example, the word ‘but’ is equivalent to ‘and’) and renders language into a purely objective series of subjects, predicates, and their various connectors. With a key indicating which letters symbolize which words, logic allows you to move between languages, or even to say the same this in the same language in multiple ways, using equivalencies. It’s interesting to see which sentences, although they have vastly different connotations, logically say the same thing. A very simple language example would be “If you don’t eat your vegetables, then you won’t get desert” and “You will eat your vegetables or you won’t get desert.” Even someone with no schooling in logic (namely, the child being addressed) knows that these sentences are equivalent; yet most people would not know you can make and if-then statement by using the word ‘or.’
I am also interested in linguistics because I am a writer. I write both poetry and prose, and I like using linguistics to various effects. An analogous situation: Anyone can do drugs, but a chemist has greater appreciation for what is actually causing the changes in their body and mind. Ya know? Anyone can write some words down, but a linguist understands what effect they actually have on the mind.
I’m going to puke on everything I know or love.
Student: Are you a vegetarian?
Me: No, why?
Student: ...because you're eating a vegetable?
Me: Yeah... Let's get back to working on those fallacies.
a student in my logic clinic (unironically)